Procurement officers get no respect. But unlike Rodney Dangerfield's character in Caddyshack, no one is threatening to develop the Butler Pitch & Putt into condos.
But procurement (how the government spends with vendors or collects money from concessioners) is one of the most highly regulated (both by the city and state law) processes of city business. And for good reason! Hundreds of millions of dollars in contracts routinely pass their way through council meeting agendas, almost entirely without public debate (although still plenty of oversight and scrutiny through the public Q&A process portion of council meeting agendas). This is a good thing as political manipulation of procurement is one of the most common causes of government corruption, misappropriation of funds, and general inefficiency.
While Council will make its decision about Butler Pitch & Putt at the meeting on June 6th, the public conversation has been lively but not always accurate:
"Kitchen and other Council members had previously kept quiet about the Butler Park issue because of the city’s anti-lobbying regulations that prevent contact between decision makers and applicants during an open bid process." — Austin Monitor (paywall)
Two key issues with this... the city's anti-lobbying ordinance does not require council to keep silent. It says that companies bidding on city contracts nor their agents can contact city staff (including council) while there is an open RFP. Versions of these rules have been in place for many years.
Also, some of us were already talking about this in public. I had already responded to a conversation on Reddit to debunk misinformation that was gaining traction after an open letter was published by the current vendor. In that post, I note:
But ultimately I have a core issue with the concept of legacy. I don't believe the community is best served by allowing existing vendors, even long-standing vendors, to manipulate or violate important procurement process just because they've had the contract for a while (or for 70+ years?!). Especially for a vendor that was already granted a no-bid contract by the council last time, in 2014. And even moreso for a vendor who's original "procurement process" was in the 1940s.
There are other misconceptions out there, based on testimony I heard at the Parks Board meeting on May 28th — that the staff recommended bidder will destroy the course or that they are some outside corporate entity that will destroy local and small business. Then there was other testimony that the recommended vendor is in fact local Austinites who love the course and want to see it improve. Like most things, there are passionate arguments on both sides, but nothing being contemplated should evoke the imagine of a crazy Bill Murray blowing up a golf course with dynamite.
Two amazing and powerful business leaders join the show this week – Marina Bhargava, President & CEO of the Greater Austin Asian Chamber of Commerce and NEW President & CEO of the Greater Austin Hispanic Chamber of Commerce (and former state rep from #atxd6) Diana Maldonado – with special performance by singer/composer Nagavalli!Read more
Joining the show this week are Kate Moore, Board Chair at the Austin Tenants Council (also VP at Austin ECHO) and Skeeter Miller from the Greater Austin Restaurant Association (and owner of The County Line on The Lake) – with a special performance by Singer/Songwriter Shelly Knight Band!Read more
It's City Budget Season! Joining the show are Selena Xie, President of the Austin EMS Association and Meme Styles, Founder & President of MeasureRead more
State Representative John Bucy III returns to The Clawback this week with Austin Chronicle Mike Clark-Madison – and special performance by Moving Panoramas Leslie Sisson!Read more
An escalating pandemic, runoff elections, criminal justice reform... we'll dig in to all of it with D1 Council Member Natasha Harper-Madison and José Garza for DA with a special performance by D6's own Monsoon Dance!Read more